Urbana, Illinois
May 28, 2004
Source:
The
Bulletin No. 10
University of Illinois
Extension Integrated Pest management
European
corn borer infestations across Illinois over the last five
seasons have been anemic. Both the statewide average number of
European corn borer larvae per plant and percentage of plants
infested verify this observation (Table 2).
Because corn planting was early and
proceeded so briskly this spring, considerable speculation
remains regarding whether the first generation of European corn
borer will establish in healthy numbers. The percentage of
plants infested in 2003 was very low (32.5%), and the
overwintering population was just slightly above 1/2 borer per
plant. Factor in other mortality- related issues, such as
mechanical death due to harvest and diseases such as Nosema
pyrausta and Beauveria bassiana, and it is reasonable
to assume the first flight of moths this spring should be a
"yawner."
However, during the first few weeks
of June, if evenings are relatively mild and mostly storm-free,
female moths may find great success in laying eggs on
susceptible (non-Bt) corn plants. The biotic potential of
European corn borers is impressive.
 |
Females can lay an average of two
egg masses each evening over roughly 10 days. Each egg mass
on average contains 20 to 25 eggs. Some quick math reveals
that is 400 to 500 offspring. Even if the survival rate is
only 10%, the potential for damage should not be taken
lightly. Producers are strongly encouraged to scout their
fields for European corn borer first-generation injury this
spring. )See below for detailed scouting procedures for this
insect pest).
Many questions remain unanswered
regarding the broader ecological effects of Bt hybrids on
regional and statewide densities of European corn borer. It
seems reasonable to suggest that in areas where the use of
Bt hybrids is highly concentrated, densities of European
corn borer may be pushed to very low sub-economic levels
across the landscape. And even those producers who don't
plant Bt hybrids will very likely benefit in varying degrees
depending on their proximity to Bt fields.
How much credit
should the use of Bt hybrids be given for the statewide
shortage of European corn borers in recent memory?
Some entomologists, including me, are
beginning to believe that the population suppressive
benefits of Bt hybrids across the landscape may have been
underestimated initially. However, a review of fall survey
data for European corn borer (in several states) reveals
that this insect has gone through periods of very low
densities well before the introduction of Bt hybrids. The
interaction of environmental factors (biotic and abiotic)
with the several life stages of the European corn borer is
complex, and we still have much to learn.— |
First-generation European Corn Borer injury (shotholing). |
Mike Gray
Monitoring European Corn Borer
Source:
University of Illinois
Extension Integrated Pest management
Both first-
and second-generation corn borers cause yield losses in many
areas of Illinois. The trend toward planting long-season corn
varieties very early has contributed to larger populations of
corn borers. When planted early, long-season hybrids can be
attacked by the first generation and may still be attractive to
the second generation. In addition, most reduced-tillage
systems, especially those that do not include plowing, permit
increased survival of the overwintering population of borers.
As a first
step in managing European corn borers, growers should consider
selecting a hybrid that is resistant or tolerant. Some
"conventional" hybrids are resistant to first-generation corn
borers, and others have some degree of tolerance to corn borer
injury. Genetically transformed hybrids expressing the Bt
gene that produces the toxic protein should provide season-long
control of European corn borers. However, the decision to plant
Bt-corn hybrids should be accompanied by considerations
for managing the potential for the development of corn borer
resistance to the Bt gene. Refer to
Bt-Corn for Control of European Corn Borer for more
details about Bt-corn and resistance management.
Scouting
and Decision Making for First-Generation European Corn Borer
Scouting Procedure. Corn that is planted early (the
fields with the tallest corn) should be monitored closely during
June and early July for signs of whorl feeding by corn borer
larvae. The fields with the tallest corn are the most attractive
to moths that are lay-ing eggs for the first generation. Plan to
scout cornfields for injury at least once a week for 2 to 4
weeks after the initial corn borer moth flight, generally from
early June to early July. Grassy areas and soybean fields that
border cornfields may harbor large numbers of corn borer moths
because female moths rest in these areas during the day. Check
these areas for moths before you enter the field to determine if
they are present.
To
determine whether or not an insecticide treatment is
economically justified, examine 100 plants (10 consecutive
plants at 10 different locations in a field, always avoiding
field edges) for shot-hole feeding in the whorl leaves. At each
location, unroll the whorl leaves of an infested plant (one with
shot-hole feeding) and count the live corn borers. Calculate the
percentage of plants infested and the average number of live
borers per infested plant. Also note the location of the corn
borer larvae. Those that are still in the whorl leaves can be
controlled; those that have bored into the stalk are protected
from the insecticide. If all larvae have left the whorl leaves
and bored into the stalk, treatments will not be effective. For
best results, treatment should be applied soon after egg hatch
to kill the young larvae before they bore into the plant. The
larvae begin tunneling into the stalks about 10 days after
hatching.
Decision
Making.
To decide whether or not it is profitable to treat a field
infested with first-generation corn borers, you need the
following information.
- average percentage of
plants with whorl feeding
- average number of larvae
per infested plant
- crop growth stage
- expected yield per acre
- anticipated value of
grain per bushel
- cost per acre for
insecticide treatment
Enter these
data into the
management worksheet for first-generation corn borer to
calculate the gain or loss if an insecticide is applied.
Following is an example (completed form is found in
Insecticides Specified in this Chapter).
Assume a 20
percent infestation (20 of 100 plants with whorl-feeding injury
caused by first-generation borers) of early whorl-stage corn,
with an average of 1.5 corn borer larvae per plant. Expected
yield is 160 bushels per acre, and the corn price is $3.00 per
bushel. Also assume 80 percent control with granules, and cost
of control is $12 per acre. Enter this information into the
worksheet for first-generation corn borers, as indicated on the
example worksheet. Obviously, 20 percent infestation in this
example does not warrant a treatment ($12-per-acre control cost
– $5.76- per-acre preventable yield loss = – $6.24 per acre loss
if the field is treated). However, if infestation were 50
percent, control would be economically justified
($14.40-per-acre preventable yield loss – $12 per-acre control
cost = $2.40 gain). Typically, if expected yield, price per
bushel of corn, or anticipated percentage control increases,
economic justification for control is more likely. Conversely,
if expected yield or price per bushel of corn decreases, or if
cost of control increases, economic justification for control is
less likely.
Much of the
information and suggested guidelines on the worksheets were
derived from research trials conducted over many years in
numerous locations throughout the Corn Belt. However, if your
experience or environmental conditions in your area suggest that
other figures might be more accurate, use them instead. For
example, if you believe you can achieve 90 percent control with
a certain insecticide, use 90 percent instead of 80 percent (our
average guideline). If you estimate that survival is less or
more than 20 percent (for whatever reason), multiply the
percentage survival (decimal point) by 23 (average number of
eggs in a mass) to obtain an estimated average number of borers
per plant.
Scouting
and Decision Making for Second-Generation European Corn Borer
Scouting Procedure. Start checking for egg masses when
moth flight is under way, usually from July through mid-August.
Concentrate initial scouting efforts in late-planted fields,
where the probability of an economic corn borer infestation is
greatest. Scout fields at least once a week and continue
scouting throughout the egg-laying period. Examine a minimum of
50 plants, selected at random throughout the field, and count
the number of corn borer egg masses found on each plant.
Although 90 percent of the egg masses are laid on the ear leaf
and the three leaves above and below the ear leaf, you should
plan to examine all the leaves on each plant. Decision Making.
To determine if it is profitable to treat a field infested with
second-generation corn borers, you need the following
information:
- average number of
European corn borer eggmasses per plant
- crop growth stage
- expected yield per acre
- anticipated value of
grain per bushel
- cost per acre for
insecticide treatment.
Because the
egg-laying period of the second flight of moths is extended, you
should accumulate egg counts for consecutive scouting trips. For
example, if you find an average of 0.2 egg mass per plant on
your first scouting trip and 0.4 egg mass per plant on your
second scouting trip 5 days later, add the two counts to
determine the cumulative count. However, do not accumulate the
number of plants sampled; this number should remain constant. In
this example, the cumulative count is 0.6 egg mass per plant.
Enter these
data into the
management worksheet for second-generation corn borer to
calculate the gain or loss if an insecticide is applied.
For best
results, treatment should be applied soon after egg hatch to
kill the young larvae before they bore into the plant. The
larvae begin tunneling into the stalks about 10 days after
hatching. |