March 5, 2004
New fronts are opening up in the
long and complex scientific assault on the cereal disease crown
rot, which costs Australian graingrowers an estimated $56
million a year.
Stephen Simpfendorfer, Tamworth based pathologist with NSW
Agriculture, told advisers and growers at Grains Research
Updates in Dubbo, Nyngan and Narrabri the
Grains Research and
Development Corporation (GRDC) had brought seven projects
together in a Strategic Initiative on crown rot, common root rot
and Fusarium head blight.
Dr Simpfendorfer said scientists from NSW Agriculture,
Queensland's Department of Primary Industries, the South
Australian Research and Development Institute, CSIRO and the
Universities of New England, Sydney, Western Sydney, Queensland
and Southern Queensland were collaborating on the initiative.
The NSW Agriculture team at Tamworth was concentrating on
disease management, with the effects of rotations on crown rot
and their interactions with soil biology being a major thrust of
the research.
"Trials at Tamworth showed brassica crops were generally more
effective than chickpea in reducing the severity of crown rot in
following wheat crops more so in the susceptible durum variety
Yallaroi than in the partially resistant bread variety Sunco,"
Dr Simpfendorfer said.
"But there was no evidence to suggest that higher levels of
chemical compounds called isothiocyanates (ITCs) released from
the taproot of
brassicas and capable of biofumigation effects reduced
survival of the
crown rot fungus in stubble, or the severity of the disease in
following wheat crops.
"The breakdown rate of crop residue on which the crown rot
fungus survives is directly related to microbial activity,
which is itself dependent on soil moisture and temperature.
"NSW Agriculture trials at Tamworth have found that residue
breakdown is faster under break crops with denser canopies the
brassicas, faba beans, or sorghum in summer than under a crop
like chickpeas, which do not close over until later in the
season.
"It is believed the denser canopies provide a more conducive
environment for microbial breakdown."
Dr Simpfendorfer said measurements of wheat stubble cover
following various rotation crops in 2002 showed remaining
stubble cover to be greatest after wheat (85%), then chickpea
(40%), canola (29%) faba beans (27%) and lowest following
sorghum (15%).
Further research found higher levels of trichoderma fungi
commonly associated with the biological control of plant
pathogens in wheat following brassicas than in wheat following
chickpeas or cereals.
Laboratory experiments had shown wheat plants colonised by
trichoderma totally excluded the crown rot fungus. But others
found that the fungi needed three months, at a temperature of 30
degrees, in moist soil, for best displacement of the crown rot
fungus. They were not likely to get that in many years.
This season NSW Agriculture was establishing a new trial at
Tamworth to spray trichoderma onto cereal stubble under various
rotation crops, believing the crop canopies would provide a
microclimate conducive to the activity of trichoderma and
hopefully improve the efficiency of break crops in managing
crown rot.
Research with trichoderma, and its potential to help stubble
breakdown, was also being carried out in other areas, including
some work under the GRDC's Eastern Farming Systems project on
the Liverpool Plains, where the major problem was stubble loads
after big grain crops.
"Managing stubble, and finding a balance between its positive
role in conservation farming and its negative one in hosting the
crown rot fungus, will be the key to eventual control of the
disease," Dr Simpfendorfer said.
"Recent work by the University of New England has shown that
stubble carrying the crown rot fungus has to be in direct
contact with the growing cereal plant to initiate infection. A
gap as small as two millimetres can prevent infection,
"Hence we're looking at the potential of trash whippers which
have been used to move cereal stubble away from germinating
canola plants to do the same thing for cereals.
"We are interested in what effect this may have on levels of
crown rot infection."
xx |