London, United
Kingdom
January 2004
(published
5 March 2004)
ADVISORY
COMMITTEE ON RELEASES TO THE ENVIRONMENT
Advice on a notification for marketing of
herbicide tolerant and insect resistant GM hybrid maize
Notifier:
Monsanto Europe S.A.
Notification
reference:
C/GB/02/M3/3
Product:
Hybrid maize genetically modified for herbicide
tolerance and insect resistance, transformation events NK603 and
MON810.
Scope:
For
the import of grain derived from hybrid maize containing events
NK603 and MON810 and for processing and use as for any other
maize. This notification excludes cultivation.
Date: 30
January 2004
Advice of the
Advisory Committee on Releases to the Environment (ACRE) under
S.124 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (Part VI) to the
Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs,
Scottish Ministers, Ministers of the Welsh Assembly Government
and the Department of Environment (Northern Ireland).
Advice:
ACRE
has considered this notification for the import and use
of herbicide tolerant and insect resistant hybrid maize
based on transformation events NK603 and MON810. The
Committee considers that sufficient information has been
provided by the notifier to demonstrate that this hybrid
GM maize does not pose a risk to human health or the
environment. The marketing of this product for
importation and processing in the UK will be no
different from that of other maize imported for
processing and animal feed purposes. In coming to this
conclusion ACRE have taken account of the advice of the
Advisory Committee on Animal Feedingstuffs (ACAF)
Genetic Modification sub-group.
ACRE
recommends that if consent is issued, it should be
conditional on the notifier providing detailed
arrangements for general surveillance of this product.
Post-market monitoring reports should be provided to the
regulatory authorities on an annual basis.
|
|
Comment
This
notification was received by the UK as the lead competent
authority. ACRE considered this notification and the potential
risks arising from importation and commercial use of this GM
maize. The scope of the notification excludes cultivation and
the Committee considered this notification in this context.
Molecular
characterisation
Hybrid maize
NK603 X MON810 is produced by a single traditional cross of
NK603 maize and MON810 maize inbred lines (homozygous for the
respective introduced trait). The F1 hybrid seed is used for
crop production. The harvested F2 grain is for import and use as
any other maize, but not for further cultivation.
Evaluation of
the GM maize hybrid was carried out on the basis of information
on the parental lines rather than full molecular
characterisation of the maize hybrid. The reader is referred to
notification C/ES/00/01 for the import and use of NK603 as for
any other maize and to consent C/F/95/12-02 issued in April 1998
by France for the cultivation and use of MON810 as for any other
maize.
NK603:
Transformation event NK603 has been produced by particle
bombardment of a maize cell culture line with a 6.7 kb MluI
fragment of the bacterial plasmid vector PV-ZMGT32. This
DNA fragment includes two plant gene expression cassettes, each
containing a copy of a gene coding for glyphosate tolerance,
5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) from
Agrobacterium sp. strain CP4 engineered to be under
the control of the rice actin promoter (cassette 1) and the
enhanced Cauliflower Mosaic Virus 35S (e35S) promoter
(cassette 2) and the nopaline synthase terminator (NOS)
sequence. Expression of the Agrobacterium CP4 epsps
gene confers tolerance to glyphosate, the active ingredient
in Roundup herbicide.
ACRE considered that the molecular characterisation of event
NK603 was of sufficient quality to allow the assessment of any
potential hazards. The Committee is content that the data
support the conclusion that the insert is present as a single
copy in the nuclear maize genome and that vector backbone
sequences are absent from maize line NK603. Sequence analysis
concludes that gene expression cassette 1 in the insert is
identical to that of the donor plasmid. Sequence analysis of
gene expression cassette 2 in the insert revealed two nucleotide
changes compared to the donor plasmid and at the 3’ end, the
insert includes an inversely linked 217 bp DNA fragment of the
enhancer region of the rice actin promoter but does not contain
sequences required for promoter activity. ACRE considered that
these molecular rearrangements did not pose any safety risks.
ACRE is satisfied that the 3’ and 5’ ends of the insert are
contained within the maize genome and with the identification of
the flanking region sequences to 307 bp 5’ and 497 bp 3’ of the
NK603 insert. A short RNA (1.4 kb) transcription product was
detected which initiated from the 3’ end of the NK603 insert and
extended beyond the NOS 3’ terminator into the maize genome
flanking the 3’ end of the inserted DNA. The committee is
content that that this short “read through” transcription
product is not expected to have a regulatory function and that
it does not alter the risk assessment for NK603 maize. In
addition, ACRE is content that the PCR detection protocol
provided for NK603 is event-specific.
MON810:
Transformation event MON810 has been produced by particle
bombardment of maize with a 5.5 kb NdeI fragment of the
plasmid PVZMBK07, which contains one copy of the e35S
promoter, the maize heat shock protein gene (hsp70)
intron an d most of the Cry1A(b) open reading frame,
sufficient to encode the insecticidally active Cry1A(b) protein.
ACRE considered the molecular characterisation for event MON810
was of sufficient quality to allow the assessment of any
potential hazards. The Committee is content that the data
support the conclusion that the inserted DNA sequences are
present as a single copy in the nuclear maize genome and that
vector backbone sequences are absent from the maize line MON810.
Sequence analysis concludes that the insert is identical to that
of the donor plasmid. ACRE is satisfied that the 3’ and 5’ ends
of the insert are contained within the maize genome and with the
identification of the flanking region sequences to 244 bp 5’ and
606 bp 3’ of the MON810 insert. The committee is satisfied that
the molecular characterisation of MON810 does not indicate any
potential hazards. In addition, ACRE is content that the PCR
detection protocol provided for MON810 is event-specific.
Animal feed
safety
The safety of
grain derived from NK603 X MON810 maize for use as animal feed
was assessed by the ACAF GM sub-group. In considering the safety
of NK603 X MON810 for use in animal feed, the safety of the gene
products, compositional analysis and data from animal feeding
studies were taken into account.
Safety of the expressed proteins
There is a
growing and substantial body of data on the CP4 EPSPS protein
establishing its inherent safety in other maize lines and in
other crops. ACAF is content that there is sufficient evidence
to demonstrate the safety of the CP4 EPSPS protein from the
NK603 line. Equivalent studies and safety assessments were made
with the Cry1A(b) protein in pursuit of approval for line
MON810.
Comparative compositional analysis
Compositional
analysis was conducted on NK603 X MON810 hybrid maize grain and
forage samples taken in 3 one-year field trial sites in France
compared with samples from a non-transgenic control hybrid and 5
different non-transgenic commercial maize hybrids grown in
replicated plots at the same field sites. Raw grains were
analysed for their proximate composition, amino acid and fatty
acid content and for a number of anti-nutritional factors. ACAF
is content that NK603 X MON810 hybrid maize does not differ in
any biologically significant way from that of the control
varieties and that it is compositionally equivalent to its
non-transgenic control hybrid line and to other commercial
hybrids.
Animal feeding studies
NK603:
The
data provided on rat and broiler chicken feeding experiments on
parental line NK603 demonstrate that no significant differences
were observed in the growth of broiler chickens or rats fed
NK603 maize compared to the parental non-transgenic control or
other reference maize lines. Therefore, NK603 maize delivered
the nutrition expected from the compositional analysis. ACAF is
content that the results support a view that NK603 behaves as
any other maize and that no unintended effects introduced by the
event that might compromise the safety of this maize line were
present.
MON810:
Reports of rat and broiler feeding studies, generated after the
original EU approval was granted for MON810 maize were provided.
Overall, these additional data further support the original
conclusion that led to market approval, that MON810 behaves as
any other maize variety.
NK603 X
MON810:
Poultry feeding studies were conducted to
demonstrate the safety of NK603 X MON810 maize grain as animal
feed. The results confirm that hybrid maize NK603 X MON810 is
nutritionally equivalent to its non-transgenic counterpart and
therefore support earlier conclusions regarding the safety of
NK603 and MON810 maize grain.
Overall, the
animal feeding data assessed by ACAF support the view that the
kernels from both of the parental maize lines (NK603 and MON810)
behave as any other maize when used in the diets of animals.
ACAF is satisfied that the safety of the parental maize lines
and of the hybrid maize line has been established.
ACAF is
content that the compositional equivalence of NK603 X MON810
grain and taken together with the results of the rat and poultry
studies, these data suggest that grain from NK603 X MON810 would
behave as any other equivalent variety of maize and would not
pose a risk to livestock or consumers of livestock products.
Environmental
risk assessment
ACRE
considered carefully the environmental risk assessment for NK603
X MON810 provided by the notifier. The Committee noted that the
scope of this application was for consent to import and use (but
not to cultivate) the harvested F2 grain in the EU. The genetic
modification involves two wellestablished genes that have a
history of safe use.
The notifier
presented evidence for the genetic stability of the inserts in
hybrid maize. ACRE is satisfied with the Company’s conclusion
regarding the negligible likelihood and potential consequences
of recombination between the two non-allelic inherited genetic
sequences during mitosis and meiosis in NK603 X MON810 maize and
that this applies to both F1 hybrid seed and plants as well as
to the fraction of F2 grains containing both inserts following
Mendelian segregation.
The
environmental risk assessment does not identify any potential
differences between conventionally bred NK603 X MON810 hybrid
maize and nontransgenic maize varieties for phenotypic
characteristics, with the exception of the two new
characteristics, tolerance to glyphosate and insect resistance.
ACRE considered the potential for gene dissemination and gene
transfer from NK603 X MON810. No differences in dissemination
capacity or increased potential for gene transfer have been
observed in pollen, seed and vegetative material from NK603 X
MON810 compared with non-GM maize. Since maize does not
establish properly outside the agricultural environment, the
impact of escape of grain during storage or transport on gene
transfer into other maize crops or weeds was considered to be
extremely low. Members considered that because of the low
germination rate and subsequent low viability of any germinated
maize volunteer plants there were no anticipated environmental
risk problems.
Post-market
monitoring
The aim of the
case-specific part of the post-market monitoring plan (PMMP) is
to investigate any risks identified in the environmental risk
assessment, and to test any assumptions made in the risk
assessment. ACRE agrees that on the basis of the risk assessment
for NK603 X MON810 there is no requirement for case-specific
monitoring. For the general surveillance part of the PMMP the
notifier proposes to make use of those people and their networks
that are responsible for transport, processing and handling of
the GM maize grain. Monsanto proposes to submit reports of the
outcome of this monitoring on an annual basis after
authorisation. Although ACRE were content with the general
surveillance aspects of the PMMP, the committee recommends that
provision of the detailed arrangements for general surveillance
should be made a condition of any consent. These further details
should include: (1) precisely who will be requested to provide
information; (2) what type of information will be requested and
the frequency of requests and (3) how the Company will ensure
participation to ensure a robust assessment.
This document in PDF format:
http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/advice/pdf/acre_advice47.pdf
|