News section
Many European farmers are eager to give biotech crops a try, says head of European Landowners' Organization
July 13, 2004

Widespread European adoption would boost production, yield.

Some may be surprised to learn that many European farmers are looking to plant biotech crops.

But not Thierry de l'Escaille (photo), head of the Belgium-based European Landowners' Organization (ELO), which represents several million farmers and other rural business owners in 25 countries that make up the recently expanded European Union (EU).

"A lot of farmers in our organization are quite interested in growing GM crops," said l'Escaille. "Biotechnology could also be a good tool to help rural areas — for the economy and for the environment." 

As the owner and operator of farms in Belgium, France and the Netherlands, l'Escaille said he, too, would like the opportunity to plant biotech crops. He grows a variety of crops, including conventional sugar beets, corn and potatoes. Enhanced biotech varieties of all three of these crops have been approved for planting in the United States, but not in the countries where he farms.  

A recent study found that the wide-scale adoption of these three biotech crops in Europe could significantly increase annual production, improve farmer income by more than 1 billion Euros (US$1.18 billion) and reduce spraying practices. (1) 

"With results like these, it's easy to understand why farmers want access to this new technology," said l'Escaille

Although the public debate over plant biotechnology continues in Europe, l'Escaille said the issue has evolved to where it is now driven more by politics than by public concerns about food safety or the environment.

"Five or six years ago, some people were asking legitimate questions about GMOs," said l'Escaille. "But most of those questions have been answered. With biotech crops, it's possible to grow food that is safe to eat and even better for the environment."

The British Medical Association (BMA), which at one time had questioned the safety of biotech crops, for example, recently said it supports the UK government's decision to allow commercial planting of biotech corn. (2)

Sir David Carter, chairman of the BMA's Board of Science, said it was time to "move away from the hysteria that has so often been associated with GM foods." (3)

In response to such statements by BMA and other influential groups, European attitudes toward biotechnology have gradually grown more positive since 1999. (4) Landowners, farmers and policymakers are looking to move forward.

"My personal feeling is that many of the decision makers are looking for a solution to the dispute over biotech crops," said l'Escaille. "With more balanced information, the public is beginning to see some of the benefits of agricultural biotechnology. But I can't plant biotech crops until the market is ready for them."

To date, Spain is the only country in the European Union where biotech crops are commercially grown — about 5 percent of its acreage is planted with corn. l'Escaille said Spanish members of the ELO have been very pleased with the yield and income gains achieved with Bt corn, which is enhanced with a naturally occurring soil bacterium (Bacillus thuringiensis) to ward off insect pests.

On average, Bt yields were 6.3 percent higher than conventional varieties, according to a report from the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications.(5) That, in addition to a reduction in pesticide spraying, has translated into extra earnings of  170 Euros per hectare, or $85 an acre.

Another study suggests that the wide-scale adoption of nine biotech crops in Europe — including corn, cotton, potatoes, rapeseed, rice, sugar beets, stone fruits (peaches, apricots and plums), tomatoes and wheat — could increase production, improve farmer income and reduce spraying. (6)

l'Escaille says studies like this are stimulating the interest of farmers throughout the EU who say they need biotechnology in order to remain competitive on global markets. He said the majority of farmers in the EU are over 55 years of age and many are going out of business because their sons and daughters see no future in farming. Without access to new technologies to improve profitability, the EU farm population will continue to age and decline as young people leave the farm for more lucrative careers in cities.

Yet another concern is that biotech crop research in Europe is on the decline because of what has been perceived as the hostile political climate. While the number of biotech field trials in Europe rose sharply between 1991 and 1998, they fell by 76 percent by 2001 — from 250 in 1998 to 61 in 2001, according to a report from the European Commission.(7) As a result, the report said, scientists are leaving Europe to come to the United States or Canada to conduct their research.

"The lack of progress on the authorizations of new GMOs is having a direct impact on research activities on GMOs and GMO field trials in Europe," it said. (8)

While l'Escaille says biotechnology isn't the only answer to those problems, it's a "partial solution" to the exodus of people from rural Europe and the "brain drain" of some of its most promising young scientists.

"A lot of the pioneering work in plant improvement and genetics originated in Europe – whether it was Thomas Fairchild, the father of the modern flower garden, or Gregor Mendel, whose work was the first to identify characteristics that pass from parents to offspring," l'Escaille said.  "We can't afford to miss out now.  Our farmers and our rural communities need to stay profitable and competitive.

"As a farmer, I can only speak for myself and many like me:  We need access to this technology."

For more information:

Biotech Corn Boosts Filipino Farmer’s Income by 50 Percent— Council for Biotechnology Information

Bt Cotton Creates Three Times the Earnings for Indian Farmer— Council for Biotechnology Information

Biotech Soybeans Double Yields and Income for Romanian Farmer— Council for Biotechnology Information

------

(1) Gianessi, Leonard. "Biotechnology Has Growth Potential in Europe," National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, June 2003 press release, < http://www.ncfap.org/reports/Europe/PressReleaseJune.pdf >.

(2) Radowitz, John. "Doctors 100% Behind Decision to Allow GM Maize," Scotsman.com, March 9, 2004, <www.checkbiotech.org/root/index.cfm?fuseaction=newsletter&topic_id=5&subtopic_id=24&doc_id=7302>.

(3) Radowitz, John. "Doctors 100% Behind Decision to Allow GM Maize," Scotsman.com, March 9, 2004, <www.checkbiotech.org/root/index.cfm?fuseaction=newsletter&topic_id=5&subtopic_id=24&doc_id=7302>.

(4) "Europeans and Biotechnology in 2002: Eurobarometer 58.0," European Directorate General for Research from the project, "Life Sciences in European Society," March 31, 2003, <http://europa.eu.int/comm/public_opinion/archives/eb/ebs_177_en.pdf>.

(5) James, Clive. "Global Review of Commercialized Transgenic Crops: 2002 Feature: Bt Maize, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, December 2003, p. 85, <www.isaaa.org>.

(6) Gianessi, Leonard. "Plant Biotechnology: Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in European Agriculture: A Summary of Nine Case Studies," National Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, December 2003, <www.ncfap.org/Europe.htm>.

(7) "Life Sciences and Biotechnology – A Strategy for Europe: Progress Report and Future Orientations," Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee," May 3, 2003, p. 18, <http://europa.e.int/comm/biotechnology/html/pdf/com2003-96_en.pdf>.

(8) "Life Sciences and Biotechnology – A Strategy for Europe: Progress Report and Future Orientations," Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, to the Council and to the European Economic and Social Committee," May 3, 2003, p. 17, <http://europa.eu.int/comm/biotechnology/html/pdf/com2003-96_en.pdf>.

 Copyright © 2004 Council for Biotechnology Information.

Source: Council for Biotechnology Information

Other news from this source

9279

Back to main news page

The news release or news item on this page is copyright © 2004 by the organization where it originated.
The content of the SeedQuest website is copyright © 1992-2004 by
SeedQuest - All rights reserved
Fair Use Notice