Sydney, Australia
February 25, 2004
The GM canola debate has the potential to run off
the rails, according to the
New South Wales Farmers'
Association, unless the truth about trials is made public.
Chair of the Association's Grains Committee, Angus Macneil says
the recent flurry of claims and speculation about GM canola
trials is stopping growers from having any chance of making an
informed decision and the middle ground must be found.
"The
Association supports trials and says they are necessary in
providing answers to many concerns such as agronomic
performance, trade issues, segregation, marketing and insurance.
"These are
the issues that currently concern growers and GM canola should
be put through rigorous testing of real-life situations like any
new product.
"Our policy
recommends the use of larger scale trials and we are calling on
the NSW Government to publicly state the size of the trials and
how they will operate.
"Speculation on whether the companies will insure and provide
cover for liability to those who agree to trial the technology
has also continued to fuel the debate.
"The
Association believes the proponents of the trial must ensure
that farmers who participate in these trials are covered, and
the biotech companies must publicly identify their position on
insurance and liability.
“Farmers
need some assurance that they won’t end up with the prospect of
court and legal fees.
"The
Association will be pushing for all areas of the trials to be
run within the strictest guidelines, with close monitoring of
each step, and for contingency plans to be drawn up to deal with
anything that may go wrong," Mr Macneil concluded. |