Brussels, Belgium
April 23, 2004
Today, the EU Commission announced the publication of its second
progress report on the
EU’s life sciences and biotechnology strategy, tracking
developments since the Commission put in place a comprehensive
strategy in January 2002 to reap the social and economic
benefits from biotechnology. The strategy was subsequently
adopted by the Prime Ministers and Heads of State as part the
Lisbon plan to become the most competitive knowledge based
economy in the world by 2010. “Sadly, this year’s progress
report is not reporting much progress,” says Feike Sijbesma,
Chairman of EuropaBio – the European association for
bioindustries. “It is repeating yet again that Member States
have to implement rules they agreed a long time ago.”
Still seven Member States have not implemented the biotech
patent’s directive (98/44), eight Member States have not
implemented the directive on GMOs (2001/18), the target of 15%
of biotech SMEs in the EU research framework programme has not
been met, and still there is no progress on the Community
Patent. “We acknowledge the EU Commission’s efforts in trying
to strengthen the scientific and technological basis of Europe
and to improve its global competitiveness,” says Johan
Vanhemelrijck, EuropaBio Secretary General. “The institution
has played an important role in concluding the recent major
review of the pharmaceutical rules, which has given the world
the first framework legislation for biosimilar medical
products. The € 500 million venture capital transfer from the
EIB to finance innovative biotechnology firms is a concrete
support measure also piloted through by the Commission. But
Member States need to give more support to the Commission’s
efforts.”
Europe needs real progress in the field of the Community Patent,
the moratorium, the patents directive, and the fostering of
young enterprises. According to Johan Vanhemelrijck “This will
help national biotech communities across Europe to prosper
throughout the new Europe and not only limit its development to
confined regions.”
Because some Member States are not adopting EU wide rules, EU
wide measures are losing out to certain national policies. More
and more Member States are not waiting for Europe, fiscal
measures to promote the “brain-gain” like the French Innovative
Company status and the most recent Belgian initiative to lure
the private sector to spend more on research are good examples
of concrete measures that really make a difference. “The lack of
an EU wide approach will put Member States in competition.
While this could result in a two speed Europe, it may also help
create leading economies to lift the overall competitiveness of
Europe.”
The Competitiveness in Biotechnology Advisory Group (CBAG)
advising the Commission on the EU life’s science strategy calls
for an EU wide stock market to improve the access of private
biotech companies to finance. “This is another topic of crucial
importance to innovative, yet fragile industries and policy
makers need to have the courage to tackle it urgently,” says
Johan Vanhemelrijck.
EuropaBio,
the European Association for Bioindustries, has 35 corporate
members operating worldwide and 23 national biotechnology
associations representing some 1200 small and medium sized
enterprises involved in research and development, testing,
manufacturing and distribution of biotechnology products. |