Urbana-Champaign, Illinois
October 6, 2003
The pattern of
soybean price behavior since mid-September is very typical of a
"short crop" year, said a
University of Illinois Extension marketing specialist.
"Since
mid-September, soybean prices have increased a little more
rapidly than product prices, soybean oil prices have been
stronger than meal prices, basis in many areas has strengthened,
and the inverse in the futures market-beyond March 2004-has
increased," said Darrel Good.
"In the short
crop years of 1980, 1983, and 1988, the highest cash price of
the marketing year occurred in September twice and November
once. However, in the yield-declining years of 1993, 1995, and
1999, the highest cash price occurred well after harvest-May
once and July twice. The magnitude of the production decline
this year, as revealed in the October and November USDA reports,
should provide more insight on whether or not to expect an early
price peak."
Good's
comments came as he reviewed soybean prices. November 2003
soybean futures were trading near $5.20 before the USDA's August
production forecast of 2.862 billion bushels, moved to near $6
in front of the September forecast of 2.643 billion bushels, and
to $7 last week.
"The higher
soybean prices since mid-September were fueled mostly by reports
of disappointing yields," said Good. "In addition, a rapid pace
of export sales and some early talk of dry weather in parts of
South America contributed to the price rally."
Reports of
very low yields from early-maturing soybeans have been replaced
by some reports of more normal yields in later-maturing
soybeans. Eastern and southern areas may have near-normal
yields and western areas are likely to have below-normal yields,
but that is in line with the USDA's September forecast.
"Does the
market now accurately reflect production potential?" said Good.
"Or has there been a significant under or over reaction to early
yield reports? The USDA's October production forecast has the
potential to move prices significantly in either direction."
Good noted
that in recent years, there have been some large differences
between the USDA's September and October soybean production
forecasts. Large declines in October (3 to 5 percent) occurred
in 1995, 1998, 1999, and 2000. The declines in 1999 and 2000
followed declines in September, while the smaller October
forecasts in 1995 and 1998 followed larger forecasts in
September.
"This year,
the market obviously expects a smaller forecast in October,"
said Good. "Seemingly, the only question to be answered is how
much lower?"
Private
estimates released last week reflected declines of 25 to 80
million bushels. Anticipating the change in the USDA production
forecast this year is complicated by the announcement that the
USDA will use administrative data (primarily from the Farm
Services Administration) to adjust acreage in the October
report.
"This data has
traditionally not been available until December," said Good.
"In addition, USDA will ask producers in the Missouri survey to
update harvested acreage estimates.
"The worries
about U.S. crop size have been compounded a bit by the rapid
pace of export sales. As of Sept. 25, the USDA reported that
373 million bushels of U.S. soybeans had been exported or sold
for export during the 2003-04 marketing year."
Commitments
were 35 percent larger than on the same date last year, while
the USDA has projected a 10 percent drop in exports for the
year. Both the European Union and China have purchased more
U.S. soybeans than at this time last year.
"The current
pace of export sales-seasonally adjusted-cannot be maintained,
even with further declines in the size of the domestic crush,"
said Good. "Current prices, along with prospects for a large
South American harvest in 2004, may be high enough to trim the
rate of export sales. However, the magnitude of the needed cut
in exports is still not known."
After the U.S.
harvest is completed and the forecast size of the crop is
updated in November, attention will focus more intently on 2004
South American production prospects. The USDA has forecast a 7
percent increase in South American soybean acreage and a 5.8
percent increase in production. The recent soybean price rally
may lead to a larger increase in area, but the focus will be on
yield prospects.
Average yields
in Brazil and Argentina have been trending higher, but
year-over-year declines have occurred. Over the past 14 years,
the average yield in Brazil was below that of the previous year
four times. The declines ranged from 0.4 percent to 8 percent.
Year-over-year declines in Argentina occurred in six of the past
14 years. The declines ranged from 0.9 percent to 13 percent.
"By comparison
over the past 14 years, the average U.S. yield was lower than
the previous year four times, in a range of 4 to 15 percent,"
said Good. "The September forecast for 2003 was for a 2.7
percent decline. In general, it appears that yield declines in
poor years are less severe in South America, particularly in
Brazil, than in the United States."
Bob Sampson, Ph.D.
Communications Specialist
News and Public Affairs
Office of Information Technology and Communication Services
College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign |