West Lafayette, Indiana
November 21, 2003
A recent
Purdue University study has uncovered the processes responsible
for shutting down scent production in certain flowers once
they've been pollinated – a finding that may help the
horticulture industry enhance floral scent.
Natalia Dudareva, associate professor of horticulture, and
her colleagues have recently identified the molecular mechanisms
that cause petunias and snapdragons to decrease scent production
after they've been visited by pollinators such as bees or moths.
The researchers also proved that fertilization, the reproductive
process that follows pollination, triggers a decline in scent
production. In addition, their research has identified a new
role for the plant hormone ethylene.
The study
will appear in the December issue of
The Plant Cell and is published online in advance of print
today at
The Plant Cell Preview.
"Until now,
nothing has been known about the molecular mechanisms that shut
down scent production after pollination," Dudareva said. "This
study gives us a better understanding of how plants regulate
floral scent production and how to improve floral scent in
unscented flowers."
Over years
of breeding for characteristics such as longevity, color and
flower size, many commercially-produced flowers have lost their
scent.
"It makes
sense. To increase shelf life, a flower needs to save energy,
and maybe the trade-off was that these flowers don't expend
energy on producing scent anymore," Dudareva said.
To her
surprise, she found that while petunias and snapdragons rely on
some of the same compounds and processes to produce scent, these
flowers regulate their post-pollination scent production in
different ways at the molecular level.
In all
flowers, a variety of substances known as volatile compounds
contribute to floral scent, Dudareva said. A volatile compound
called methylbenzoate is one of the most abundant scent
compounds in many flowers, including petunias and snapdragons.
Dudareva
previously showed that both petunias and snapdragons produce
methylbenzoate through a process called methylation. During
methylation, an enzyme adds a small molecular unit, called a
methyl group, to a compound called benzoic acid, found in the
petals. Two different, but related, enzymes called BAMT in
snapdragons and BSMT in petunias are responsible for the
methylation reaction that produces methylbenzoate and a
bouquet's bouquet.
In the
current study, Dudareva and her colleagues found that in
petunias the plant hormone ethylene, which is produced after
pollination, suppresses activity of the gene that triggers the
creation of BSMT. Without BSMT, the flower cannot produce the
methylbenzoate responsible for its scent.
"In this
study we found that genes that regulate scent production are
sensitive to ethylene," Dudareva said. "This was entirely
unknown and was a big surprise for us."
Ethylene
plays a role in many plant development processes, including
fruit maturation, leaf drop and various stress responses, but
has not previously been shown to play a role in regulating
scent.
Snapdragons, Dudareva found, are somewhat sensitive to ethylene,
but not to the extent of petunias. While ethylene essentially
shuts down scent emission in petunias after pollination, the
hormone does not elicit this effect in snapdragons.
Instead,
scent emission in snapdragons is regulated by a change in the
ratio of two compounds produced in snapdragon flowers, Dudareva
said. One of these compounds, called SAM, donates the methyl
groups used in the methylbenzoate-producing reaction. The other
compound, called SAH, is produced as a result of the methylation
reaction. Taken together, the relative amounts of these two
compounds are called the "methylation index."
Changes in
this index contribute to the decline in scent emission after
pollination in snapdragons, Dudareva said.
"It's a
feedback loop, and both compounds compete to react with the BAMT
enzyme," she said.
Disrupting
BAMT activity ultimately decreases production of the scent
compound, she said.
While
petunias and snapdragons rely on different mechanisms to
suppress or decrease scent emission, Dudareva has shown that in
both types of flowers fertilization somehow provides a signal to
plants, telling them to stop producing scent.
"What we
found very interesting is that fertilization, not just
pollination, gives a signal to downregulate floral scent," she
said. "For two days after pollination, scent does not go down in
snapdragons."
When it
lands on a flower, pollen produces a structure called a pollen
tube. This tube burrows into the flower and makes fertilization
possible by giving the pollen access to the flower's ovary.
"Production
of scent is an expensive process from an energy point of view,
so the question was, why do flowers continue to produce floral
scent if they're already pollinated? We found that in
snapdragons it takes about 48 hours for the pollen tubes to
reach the ovary, and this is what shuts down floral scent," she
said.
Petunias
also show a delay between pollination and decreased scent
production. As is the case with snapdragons, the delay in
petunias also matches the length of time it takes for pollen
tubes to reach the ovaries, Dudareva said.
This tight
coupling between pollination and decreased scent emission makes
sense from an evolutionary point of view, she said.
"I think
plants want to be sure that they are fertilized before they stop
producing scent," Dudareva said. "If they stop producing scent,
they won't attract any more pollinators. If the first pollen to
reach the flower doesn't reach the ovary, the flower will need
to attract more pollinators or it won't produce fruit."
Dudareva
suggests that differences in the floral architecture of petunias
and snapdragons may account for the different mechanisms these
plants use to shut down scent production, but she has not yet
investigated this topic experimentally.
"The
differences could have to do with floral arrangement on the
different types of plants, but it's just a hypothesis," she
said.
Collaborating on the study were Florence Negre, Christine Kish
and Jennifer Boatright of Purdue University; Beverly Underwood,
Kenichi Shibuya and David G. Clark of the University of Florida;
and Conrad Wagner of Vanderbilt University.
The
National Science Foundation, the Fred Gloeckner Foundation Inc,
the American Floral Endowment, the USDA Floriculture and Nursery
Research Initiative, and the Florida Agriculture Experimental
Station funded this research. |