March 26, 2003
Putting trait genes
into plastids is a very effective method for dramatically
reducing their transmission through pollen says University of
Manchester scientist, Dr Anil Day.
In a paper prepared for the
Live Sciences
Network, Dr Day says transposition of plastid DNA to the
nucleus has far greater consequences for our understanding of
the evolution of eukaryotic cells than it does on undermining
the containment benefits of localising genes to plastids.
Dr Day argues that while introduced trait genes may move from
plastids to the nucleus (at very low frequencies) when they get
there they are unlikely to be functional. Therefore they are
unlikely to pose
any risk of transmission of undesirable characteristics which
promote weediness and herbicide tolerance among wild species.
Intracellular
Gene Transposition Does Not Undermine The Containment Benefits
of Sequestering Trait Genes in Plastids
by Dr. Anil Day
University of Manchester,
Unite Kingdom
GENE FLOW FROM CROPS TO PLANTS IN THE
ENVIRONMENT
Crops contain a catalogue of genes responsible
for their beneficial qualities such as increased yields of
harvestable products and resistance to pests. These genes are
dispersed into the wider environment through pollen dispersal or
via seeds following capture of pollen from other sources. As a
result crop genes can end up in hybrid progeny plants where they
are mixed with genes from wild relatives or other crops. The
spread of genes from crops into the wider environment can be
followed more easily using genetically manipulated crops tagged
with performance-enhancing trait genes that are easy to track.
The persistence of crop-derived genes in weeds depends on the
ability of crop-weed hybrids to compete with other plants in the
environment. A recent study indicates that hybrids with
crop-derived genes are unlikely to persist as weeds because of
their poor performance compared to wild plants [1].
NEW TECHNOLOGIES TO REDUCE THE POLLEN-MEDIATED
SPREAD OF TRAIT GENES
The consequences of gene flow from crops to
other plants depend on the trait genes transferred to hybrids.
Trait genes enhancing the nutritional quality of crops are
unlikely to provide an advantage to any wild plants that might
acquire them. Other traits such as herbicide resistance will be
advantageous if wild plants are sprayed with herbicides to which
they are resistant but a resistance gene will be ineffective
against other groups of herbicides. The poor performance of
hybrids provides one barrier to the escape and establishment of
trait genes in the environment. Putting trait genes in plastids
rather than nuclei provides an additional barrier to reduce
their spread. The chloroplast, which contains the green pigment
chlorophyll and carries out photosynthesis, is one of the more
familiar forms of the plastid family of organelles.
Most plant genes are located in the nucleus and
these are transmitted in equal proportions by sperm and egg
cells. By contrast, in most flowering plants the sperm cells
from pollen transmit plastids at undetectable or very low
frequencies to progeny plants. Plastids are passed on to the
next generation by egg cells so that plastid genes are inherited
maternally. This means that when trait genes are placed in
plastids the pollen route of dispersal into the environment is
prevented. The potential advantages of localising trait genes in
plastids for improving GM crop design was discussed in detail by
a sub-group of the Advisory Committee on Releases to the
Environment (ACRE).
http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/bestprac/170500.htm
http://www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/bestprac/guidance/index.htm
TRAIT GENES CAN MOVE FROM PLASTIDS TO THE
NUCLEUS
A recent research letter in the scientific
journal Nature measures the frequency at which a trait gene in
the plastid can relocate or transpose to the nucleus [2].
See
http://www.nature.com/nsu/030203/030203-8.html
The frequency is low and transposition events
are detected in 1 in 16,000 pollen grains. Movement of plastid
genes to the nucleus was expected because insertions of plastid
genes have been found in chromosomes within the nucleus but the
frequency of these events was unknown. Prior to these
experiments on tobacco, DNA had been shown to escape from the
mitochondrion to the nucleus in bakers’ yeast (Saccharomyces
cerevisiae). Mitochondria carry out respiration and are
found in animal, plant and fungal cells. Like plastids,
mitochondria contain their own genes. In normal yeast, escape of
mitochondrial genes to the nucleus takes place at frequencies
between one cell out of every hundred thousand dividing cells to
one cell out of every million dividing cells [3,4]. In the yeast
experimental system escaping DNA has an origin of replication
that allows it to replicate as a small circular DNA molecule in
the nucleus. Without this origin of replication DNA transposing
to the nucleus would be lost unless it can land and accommodate
(integrate) itself into one of the yeast chromosomes housed in
the nucleus. If escaping DNA does not have an origin of
replication, which was the case in the tobacco experiments, this
added requirement to integrate into chromosomes might have been
expected to further reduce successful transposition to below one
in a hundred thousand dividing cells.
The estimated frequency of DNA transposition
from mitochondria to the nucleus in normal yeast of one event in
every hundred thousand dividing cells is almost ten-fold lower
than the frequency of plastid to nucleus transposition estimated
at one in 16,000 pollen grains. Clearly tobacco plastids are
very different from yeast mitochondria but both systems give
transposition frequencies that are within ten-fold of each
other. The extra-step of integration into tobacco chromosomes
might have been expected to reduce the overall transposition
frequency. The relatively high frequency of transposition from
the plastid to the nucleus was surprising. But there is a
proviso that prevents us drawing firm conclusions on relative
transposition rates. It should be stressed that this is a very
crude comparison because the yeast frequencies are in events per
cell division and the tobacco frequencies are in events per
pollen grain. Truly meaningful comparisons will require tobacco
figures that are calculated as transposition events per cell
division. This will require further work on the timing of
transposition, which might take place randomly during plant
growth and development or be restricted to particular cell
types. Estimates of transposition frequency will also depend on
experimental design e.g. the type of gene that is tracked.
TRAIT GENES THAT TRANSPOSE FROM THE PLASTID TO
THE NUCLEUS ARE NOT FUNCTIONAL
The experimentally obtained frequency of plastid
to nuclear transfer of DNA is useful for risk evaluation.
Numbers for individual steps in the pathway leading to escape
and establishment of a trait gene in the environment can be
combined to assess the overall cumulative risk. The figure of 1
in 16,000 pollen grains is very low but given the global acreage
of a crop there is likely to be some pollen transmission of a
recently transposed plastid gene. The majority of these
transposed genes will not be functional because plastid
regulatory elements don’t function in the nucleus. In the
experiments carried out by Huang, Ayliffe and Timmis, the
plastid gene that was tracked was modified to work well in the
nucleus. An adjacent engineered gene that contained plastid
regulatory elements was transferred to the nucleus but once
integrated into nuclear DNA it became inactive in the 17 plants
analysed [2]. This means that a tiny fraction of pollen
(1/16,000) will contain transposed plastid genes. Most of these
will be inactive. If pollen grains with these inactive
transposed genes fertilize other plants the resulting hybrids
will contain but not express the transposed genes. Unlike the
original crop, which benefits from a functional trait gene in
the plastid the hybrids will not gain any advantage from
defective nuclear-localised trait genes.
PLASTID-LOCALISED TRAIT GENES ARE MORE LIKELY TO
BE DISPERSED BY AN EGG ROUTE THROUGH SEEDS THAN A
POLLEN-MEDIATED ROUTE INVOLVING PLASTID TO NUCLEAR TRANSPOSITION
The frequencies at which transposed genes could
be activated, due to chance chromosomal integration events in
the nucleus, is likely to be substantially less than one in 17.
If as many as one in a hundred transposed genes were functional
about one in a million pollen grains would contain a functional
transposed gene. Given this low frequency, pollen dispersal of a
plastid transgene into the environment via this transposition
route appears unlikely. Seed transmission of a plastid localised
trait gene where crop plants act as female parents is a far more
likely dispersal mechanism. However, to further reduce this
remote risk of spread through pollen following transposition it
might be wise to alter the coding sequences of a plastid gene to
prevent its expression in the nucleus.
Putting trait genes into plastids is a very
effective method for dramatically reducing their transmission
through pollen. Transposition of plastid DNA to the nucleus has
far greater consequences for our understanding of the evolution
of eukaryotic cells than it does on undermining the containment
benefits of localising genes to plastids.
REFERENCES
1. Adam D (2002) transgenic crop trial’s gene
flow turns weeds into wimps. Nature 421: 462
2. Huang CY, Ayliffe MA, Timmis JN: Direct measurement of the
transfer rate of chloroplast DNA into the nucleus. Nature,
published online, doi:10.1038/nature01435 (2003).
3. Shafer KS, Hanekamp T, White KH, Thorsness: Mechanisms of
mitochondrial escape to the nucleus in the yeast Saccharomyces
cerevisiae. Current Genetics 36:183-194 (1999)
4 Thorsness PE, Fox TD: Escape of DNA from mitochondria to the
nucleus in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 346:376-379 (1990) |