|
Wellington, New Zealand
July 9, 2003
The New Zealand Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry
today announced that its investigations into a GMO-contaminated
sweet corn crop grown at Gisborne earlier this year had produced
a significant amount of information that would require analysis
over the next week.
Results obtained from the sweet corn crop so far show the
presence of a genetically-modified organism (GMO) called Bt11,
which is present at less than 0.05 percent. This is less than
five seeds in a sample of 10,000 seeds and is well below the
Australia/New Zealand standard of 1 percent for the
unintentional presence of GM material in approved non-viable
foods. Bt11 is one of the corn varieties approved by Food
Standards Australia New Zealand for consumption in
New Zealand.
A
suite of tests designed to discover other forms of GM
contamination has also produced negative results.
MAF investigators have completed their audit of the Gisborne
company involved. Information obtained from the audit is now
being considered to determine what, if any, further
investigations of company records, processes and systems are
required. The company involved has been very co-operative and
supportive of MAF’s audit requirements, and the audit team has
complimented company officials on the completeness of their
records.
Field investigations are continuing. Of particularly interest to
MAF is finding whether there are any discernible differences
between the sweet corn crops produced from each of the four
fields in question. Additional samples of seed, and product
harvested from each of these fields has been identified and sent
to
Melbourne
for testing. Field investigations are also finalising details of
other crops that were grown in proximity to the four fields,
particularly during the crops’ flowering period. This
information will help determine whether cross-pollination or the
original seed consignment may have been a cause of the GM
contamination.
MAF is investigating several possible pathways for
contamination. These are the original seeds from the United
States; the possibility of cross-pollination from other crops
grown adjacent to the sweet corn fields at Gisborne;
contamination during the harvesting and processing stages; and
possible contamination during laboratory testing. Hopefully the
investigations will eliminate some of these pathways but it is
possible, given the extremely low level of GM contamination,
that the exact cause is never discovered.
Q&A
1. How much sweet
corn was grown?
A: About 22ha, in four fields.
2. Where is the sweet corn that was harvested?
A: Apart from about 10 tonnes sent to Japan as a trial
shipment, the balance is in a warehouse in Gisborne. This has
been confirmed by the MAF audit team.
3. Are there any discernible differences between the
four fields in terms of test results received so far?
A: This is currently an area of focus for MAF
investigators. Seed and product samples from each of the four
fields are currently being tested to see if there are any
discernible differences.
4. Were there any sweet corn or maize crops grown in
fields adjacent to the four fields in question?
A: Yes. MAF investigators are currently determining the
extent of these plantings and seeking information from land
holders and processing companies regarding the varieties grown,
planting dates, flowering dates and whether samples of seed
planted and product harvested are available. The exact number of
fields involved is not known at this time. If these crops can be
shown not to have been flowering at the same time as the crops
in question, then they can be immediately eliminated for further
investigation for cross-pollination risk.
5. What did the audit of the company reveal?
A: The audit revealed a highly professional and
co-operative company with robust and detailed records, processes
and systems. It also produced a considerable amount of
information that is now being considered by MAF investigators in
conjunction with their investigations into products, seeds and
the fields in question.
6. Is MAF planning to test more seeds and products?
A: Testing has been arranged to determine whether there are
any discernible differences between seeds planted in and product
harvested from each of the four fields in question. Some testing
may be required from adjoining sweet corn or maize crops, if
records indicate these may have been flowering at the same time
as the crops in question. This part of the investigation will be
very time consuming.
7. What tests has MAF concluded on sweet corn samples
so far?
A: On 5 July 2003
AgriQuality GMO Services, Melbourne, reported after qualitative
tests on positive samples on 3 July, that less than 0.05 percent
of the processed corn was genetically modified. The
gene-specific tests for the construct showed that the genetic
modification involved Bt11. Bt11 is an insect-resistant and
herbicide-tolerant construct which is the only commercially
available GM sweet corn. The
sample tested negative for the Maximiser (BT176), BtXtra
(DBT418), Roundup Ready (GA21), LibertyLink (T25), YieldGard
(MON810), Roundup Ready (NK603), StarLink, B16, MaxGard,
SeedLink (MS3), YieldGard (MON801, 802 and 805), Roundup Ready
(MON 832, 831 and 809), and SeedLink (MS6) varieties of GM corn.
The sample also tested negative for the Roundup Ready GM soy
variety which is the most widely grown variety of GM soy.
8. When does MAF expect to conclude its investigations?
A: By the end of next week (18 July 2003) MAF expects to have obtained sufficient information to conclude its
investigations. It is possible, given the extremely low level of
GM contamination involved, that the exact cause or pathway may
never be determined.
July 6, 2003
The New Zealand Ministry of
Agriculture and Forestry and New Zealand Food Safety
Authority officials today provided an update on their
investigations into a case of possible GM contamination of sweet
corn harvested in the Gisborne region earlier this year.
Officials from ERMA New Zealand have also been closely involved
with these investigations.
AgriQuality GMO Services laboratory in Melbourne has worked
through the weekend to determine the genetically modified
organism and the concentration at which it was present in the
corn harvested.
"The laboratory results indicate the presence of Bt11, an
insect-resistant variety of sweet corn and the only
commercially-available GM sweet corn variety. Eleven of the most
common types of GM constructs found in varieties of corn were
tested for. All of these tests showed negative results," MAF
Biosecurity group director Barry O’Neil said.
"Concentration of this GM organism is very low – less than 0.05
percent. This is less than five seeds in a sample of 10,000
seeds."
"Bt11 is one of the GM corn varieties that has been approved for
consumption in New Zealand by Food Standards Australia New
Zealand, and the level of GM concentration is well below the
Australia/New Zealand standard for unintentional presence of 1
percent," Food Safety Authority director plant and dairy
products Tim Knox said.
"Information received from the company involved suggests that
the corn exported to Japan was a trial shipment and no product
has been released for consumption in Japan or in New Zealand.
"Given this information and the outcomes of the tests, it
appears that no further action will be required by the NZFSA,"
Tim Knox said.
"MAF is investigating several possible pathways for
contamination. These are the original seeds imported from the
United States; the possibility of cross-contamination from other
crops grown adjacent to the sweet corn fields at Gisborne;
contamination during the harvesting and processing stages; and
possible contamination during laboratory testing," Barry O’Neil
said.
"Because the level of contamination is so low, the import
pathway cannot be ruled out as a source. Tests of the imported
seed line – both by the importing company and by MAF – could
have missed this contamination.
"The audit of the harvesting and processing systems will provide
more information on the possibility of contamination and on the
exact status of all material harvested.
"This audit will start on Monday once the specialists arrive.
The weekend’s severe weather, resulting in road closures and the
cancellation of some flights to Gisborne disrupted their travel
plans," Barry O’Neil said. |