August 14, 2003
Today the EU and the
US presented a joint framework to relaunch agricultural
negotiations. We have agreed that it is necessary for the two
largest trading powers to develop a joint approach to the major
issues dividing the WTO membership. It focuses on three areas,
domestic support, market access and export competition. The
joint paper reflects the great importance the EU and the US
attach to their responsibility to pave the way for a successful
and ambitious conclusion in Cancun and to provide added impetus
to the cycle of trade negotiations.
Commenting on the results of the negotiations, Agricultural
Commissioner Franz Fischler said: «Our WTO partners called on us
to show leadership and asked us to come up with something
constructive. We have now delivered. Backed by sweeping farm
policy reform, the EU is ready to lead by example and to find
common ground. I am very pleased that having worked with a
spirit of compromise and determination, we and our US friends
have been able to reach such a reasonable framework for the
further negotiations. We look forward to continuing the work
with all the WTO members, in the same constructive spirit, in
the three weeks which remain before the Cancun meeting ».
Commissioner for trade Pascal Lamy said: "I am delighted that we
have been able to reach agreement. This EC/US joint paper is
just what is required to enable the WTO negotiations to change
gear and move us into the final phase. The paper provides a
solid and sustainable basis upon which to complete the
agricultural negotiations which are, after all, the cornerstone
to the Doha Development Agenda. Both the EU and US have
committed themselves to concrete action in favour of DCs. Others
must now do their bit to bring us down the home straight."
In reaching this agreement the two trading blocs show their
commitment to the success of this round and their determination
to close some of the gaps that have until now stalled the
negotiating process on agriculture. Further gaps and obstacles
remain ; it is now up to other WTO members to assume their
responsibilities too by engaging in the negotiations in a
flexible and constructive manner.
It is hoped that members will react positively to the fact that
the EU and the US took the leadership to stimulate the
negotiation process. This paper represents a balanced base for
all members to engage in constructive negotiations and to
demonstrate their commitment for further progress.
Focus on three pillars: domestic support, market access and
export competition
In short : the paper deals with the « three pillars » of
domestic support, market access and export competition, while
making it clear that a number of other elements remain to be
addressed. For each of the three pillars the paper provides an
outline of how to carry the negotiations forward, while leaving
the details, and in particular the extent of the future
commitments, to be negotiated.
For domestic support, the paper provides for substantial cuts by
all members who use trade distorting subsidies, recognising that
those who subsidise more will have to reduce more, but ensuring
that all make efforts.
For market access, there is a formula which takes on board both
the formulas discussed to date (Uruguay Round and so-called
“Swiss” formula), while fully preserving the elements of
flexibility and recognition of the existence of sensitive
products an element of great importance to developing countries.
In fact, recognising their importance to developing countries,
flexibility and the recognition of the concept of sensitive
products for reasons of development and food security are
essential points in this paper. On top, a special safeguard is
envisaged for developing countries to protect sensitive products
from excessive imports. It goes without saying that this paper
also provides for lower tariff cuts and longer implementation
periods for these countries. In addition, the importance of
existing and future preferential access for developing countries
is recognised. Finally, there is a firm commitment from
Developed Countries to provide duty free access for a certain
percentage of their imports from DC.
On export competition, the framework paper provides several
elements. Firstly, a clearly defined parallelism between the
disciplines imposed on export subsidies refunds and exports
credits. Secondly, it provides partial elimination of export
subsidisation for a common list of product for of interest for
DC. Thirdly, it provides a path for parallel reduction of export
subsidisation for the products that are not eliminated. In
addition to that, there will be clear discipline on food aid
programs to prevent misuse and disciplines also on the
transaction of state trading enterprises.
Finally, the paper notes a number of elements not agreed,
including non-trade concerns and GIs. |