El Batan, Texcoco, Mexico
December 14, 2001
The International Maize and
Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT) has completed screening an
additional 15 Mexican maize landraces from itsmaize gene bank
and determined that none of them carried the common promoter
(cauliflower mosaic virus 35S, abbreviated as CaMv 35S)
associated with the presence of an introduced gene (transgene).
In mid-October, 2001, a screening of 28 landraces from the gene
bank also failed to indicate the presence of the promoter. In
addition, CIMMYT tested seeds from 42 Oaxacan landraces (or
farmers’ populations) that were collected in 2000 for a study on
gene flow. Again it was determined that the CaMV 35S was not
present in any of the samples. If the promoter had been found
(and those results verified), it would indicate that a
transgenic maize plant had crossed with a maize landrace, or
conventional variety, at some point in the landrace’s ancestry.
The screening work at CIMMYT was initiated in response to
published reports that transgenic corn had been found growing in
the Mexican states of Oaxaca and Puebla (September 27 [Vol. 413]
and November 29 [Vol. 414], 2001 issues of Nature). To date, all
screenings of Mexican maize landraces and varieties at CIMMYT
have failed to show the presence of either the promoter or a
transgene. Details of both sets of the new screenings are given
below.
Germplasm Screening of CIMMYT Gene Bank Materilas for DNA
Sequence Associated with
Transgenics (November 27, 2001)
Seeds of 15 Mexican maize accessions from the CIMMYT gene bank
collection were received from Dr. Suketoshi Taba, head of
CIMMYT’s maize gene bank, on October 1, 2001. Eight of the
landrace accessions were from the state of Oaxaca while the
remaining seven covered a broad geographic area ranging from
Chihuahua in the north to Chiapas in the south. These seeds were
germinated and DNA extracted according to the standard protocols
of CIMMYT’s Applied Biotechnology Center (ABC). DNA was
amplified using a primer corresponding to the CaMV 35S promoter,
a fragment of DNA found in most commercial transgenic maize and
not known to exist naturally in the maize genome (sequence
available upon request). DNA was extracted in a bulk of 10
plants, and a total of 50 plants tested per population. DNA
isolated from a known transformed plant containing the CaMV 35S
promoter was run as a positive control. To further ensure that
the reactions were working correctly, all DNA samples were
amplified using a primer corresponding to a fragment of DNA
known to exist naturally in the maize genome (in this case, SSR
marker phi076). All positive controls amplified correctly, and
no bulk of gene bank maize amplified the CaMV
Details of the study results may be obtained by contacting David
Hoisington, Director of CIMMYT's Applied Biotechnology Center,
at
d.hoisington@cgiar.org
|