| Bonn, Germany May 30, 2005
 
				
				Organic farming, the systematic conversion of 
				land to certified practices that ensure food safety and security 
				from the farm to the table, a comprehensive and fully traceable 
				system, is developing rapidly throughout the world. According to 
				the International Federation of 
				Organic Agriculture Movement’s study The World of Organic 
				Agriculture: Statistics and Emerging Trends 2005, 36 countries 
				achieved organic mega-country status in 2004, meaning that over 
				50,000 hectares of certified organic land are currently being 
				cultivated. In total, over 26 million hectares of land are 
				currently certified worldwide, generating over $25 billion in 
				revenue in 2003.
 558,449 farms in 108 countries are currently certified, and many 
				millions of people are involved in the production, marketing, 
				processing and distribution of organic products, generating 
				immense income for a great number of people while simultaneously 
				enhancing biodiversity and protecting the environment for future 
				generations.
 Organic agriculture is a holistic system that promotes and 
				enhances biodiversity, biological cycles, and soil biological 
				activity. Certified organic products are those which have been 
				produced, stored, processed, handled and marketed in accordance 
				with precise technical specifications (standards) and certified 
				as organic by a certification body. The use of GMOs within 
				organic systems is not permitted during any stage of organic 
				food production, processing or handling.
 
 The International Service for the 
				Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications (ISAAA) issues an 
				annual report on the amount of global biotech crop acreage. The 
				2005 report indicates that there were 14 biotech mega-countries 
				in 2004 – countries where more than 50,000 hectares or biotech 
				crops are being grown. The figures, however, are dubious. For 
				instance, whereas the report claims that 500,000 biotech 
				hectares are being grown in South Africa, a report from 
				Agricultural Biotechnology in Europe, an industry coalition, and 
				a survey team from the University of Reading in the UK show that 
				the ISAAA’s figures are exaggerated by factors of 20 and 30 
				respectively, and a recent report from GRAIN (www.grain.org) 
				demonstrates that out of 3,000 farmers who originally grew Bt 
				cotton there, only 700 continue to do, and many farmers who 
				chose to grow the cotton are now perilously in debt. Also, 98% 
				of the world's GM crops are still grown in only four nations - 
				USA, Canada, Argentina and a bit in China, which has remained 
				the same for the last five years.
 
 Biotech crops grown in so-called biotech mega-countries are 
				planted indiscriminately without any substantive regulatory 
				framework, increasing reliance upon dangerous herbicides and 
				pesticides, creating super-weeds and destroying biodiversity in 
				order to increase yields in the short term, but ultimately 
				rendering the cropland useless, while simultaneously 
				contaminating the world’s major food crops with undesirable 
				characteristics. This contamination is not something the biotech 
				industry should flaunt, but rather, the biotech industry should 
				be held strictly liable for all such contamination under the 
				Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Biotech crops have been riddled 
				by scandal, from StarLink corn, which was not approved for human 
				consumption but nevertheless entered the food supply, prompting 
				the recall of over 300 contaminated food products from shelves 
				in the USA and continues to linger in the food supply, to the 
				illegal entry of a 1000 tons of Bt10 into the European Union, 
				also not approved for human consumption, and the recent 
				publication of internal Monsanto documents, reviewed by EU 
				scientists, revealing serious health damage to laboratory 
				animals fed Monsanto's new genetically engineered 
				"rootworm-resistant" corn. Rats who consumed the mutant corn 
				developed smaller kidneys and exhibited blood abnormalities.
 
 Biotech crops containing industrial enzymes, pharmaceuticals, 
				viruses, antibiotic resistance markers and other traits have 
				been planted in large-scale field tests for years in the USA, 
				but tests for those experimental crops do not exist, and thus it 
				is likely that contamination of agricultural crops is much more 
				widespread.
 
 Alternatively, organic agriculture ensures food security and 
				safety for future generations, distributing income equitably 
				among those involved in the chain of production, and credibly 
				backing up its claims with thorough documentation. Organic 
				agriculture also increases or stabilizes yields in developing 
				countries, particularly in marginal and semi-arid areas, 
				increasing productivity without dependency on unaffordable 
				chemicals. The IFOAM Basic Standards include social standards 
				that ensure the protection of workers’ rights. IFOAM Accredited 
				certifiers (www.ioas.org) adhere to these social standards, and 
				IFOAM is working together with the
				International Social and 
				Environmental Accreditation and Labelling (ISEAL) Alliance 
				to improve the effectiveness and compatibility of social and 
				environmental standards and verification systems.
 
 IFOAM calls for strict liability to be imposed for the 
				introduction of GMOs. To insure that the costs of injuries 
				resulting from defective products are borne by the manufacturer 
				that put such products on the market rather than by the injured 
				persons who are powerless to protect themselves, strict 
				liability for GMOs is warranted. Strict liability ensures that 
				organic farmers and consumer receive protection from problems of 
				proof inherent in pursuing negligence, placing the burden of 
				loss on manufacturers rather than injured parties who are 
				powerless to protect themselves. IFOAM applauds the inclusion of 
				a GMO liability regime in the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 
				an idea that originated from African nations and other Third 
				World nations, and is opposed by the USA and Canada.
 
 IFOAM’s Position on Genetic Engineering:
				
				www.ifoam.org/press/positions/ge-position.html
 
 To purchase a copy of The World of Organic Agriculture: 
				Statistics and Emerging Trends 2005, go to the IFOAM website
				www.ifoam.org. Additional 
				information can be requested from the IFOAM Head Office 
				(Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5, 53113 Bonn, Germany, phone 
				+49-228-92650-10).
 |