March 2, 2004
Farmers,
consumers, Native Americans, rural advocates and organic growers
seek full review of Monsanto’s pending application
Twenty-seven
organizations formally endorsed a legal petition today asking
the Bush Administration for a thorough analysis and public
review of the social, economic and environmental impacts of
genetically engineered wheat. The groups represented diverse
constituencies, from the Minnesota
Farmers Union, to the
Center for Food
Safety, to the Organic Trade
Association, to the National
Catholic Rural Life Conference, to the
Intertribal
Agriculture Council.
he groups
signed onto a legal addendum in support of the original petition
filed by Northern Plains’ wheat farmers last March. The petition
argues that the US Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is legally obligated by the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) to conduct a full environmental
impact statement (EIS) on Monsanto’s pending application to
deregulate and commercially release genetically engineered Hard
Red Spring Wheat. USDA has never required an EIS for decisions
to release GE crop varieties, but wheat farmers and their allies
have demanded a more thorough public review of the potential
impacts of GE wheat introduction.
“When GE
varieties of other crops, like corn, were introduced, USDA
conducted only a cursory review,” said Todd Leake, a North
Dakota wheat farmer and member of the Dakota Resource Council,
one of the original petitioners. “As a result, U.S. farmers lost
millions of dollars in export markets.”
The original
petition called on USDA to institute a moratorium on the
introduction of GE wheat until an EIS is completed that
identifies potential socio-economic and environmental impacts of
USDA’s approval of Monsanto’s application. The petition argues
that the EIS should assess issues like the potential loss of
export markets; the feasibility of segregating GE wheat from
non-GE wheat; and the creation of so-called “super weeds,”
volunteer GE wheat plants that may be resistant to herbicides
and could therefore disrupt cropping practices.
“We think
we’re getting the agency’s attention,” Leake said. “After we
filed the petition last year, USDA rejected Monsanto’s initial
application as deficient. Our petition raised issues—like loss
of export markets and the danger of super weeds—that, frankly,
the USDA has never looked at seriously before in other crops.”
Monsanto
publicly stated it would resubmit its application for its
Roundup Ready GE wheat by the end of last year, but so far has
not done so.
In a cover
letter submitted with the addendum of groups, Joe Mendelson,
attorney with the Center for Food Safety, cited five new studies
that demonstrate the potential for additional adverse agronomic
impacts from the introduction of GE wheat. The letter asks USDA
to consider these studies as it decides on whether to require an
EIS.
The letter
also reiterated an earlier request that USDA release its letter
rejecting Monsanto’s original application. “[W]e [the
petitioners] would like to express our dissatisfaction in the
agency’s delay in publicly releasing the [rejection] letter sent
to Monsanto finding their petition…deficient….[T]he delay of
releasing such material…is inexcusable,” it said.
The groups
cited a study by Dr. Robert Wisner, a leading grain economist
from Iowa State University, which concluded that the commercial
release of GE wheat in the next 2-6 years could depress the
price of wheat by 33% to 50% because of likely market rejection
in Asia and Europe. The study also concluded that GE wheat
introduction would devastate the economy of the spring wheat
belt. This would occur because the loss of wheat export markets
would lead to loss of wheat acreage; loss of revenue to
industries supplying inputs to wheat producers; and losses for
other rural farm-related and non-farm businesses, local and
state government tax revenues, and institutions supported by tax
revenues.
To read the
EIS petition, the full list of signatories, the addendum cover
letter (including descriptions of the new agronomic studies on
GE wheat), and Dr. Wisner’s study of the impacts of GE wheat
introduction, go to: www.iatp.org.
The Institute for Agriculture and
Trade Policy promotes resilient family farms, rural
communities and ecosystems
around the
world through research and education, science and technology,
and advocacy. |