Bern, Switzerland
November, 2003
Biodiversity
and Agriculture - A review of the impact of agricultural
biotechnology on biodiversity
by Prof. Dr. Klaus Ammann
Director, Botanical
Garden
University of Bern, Switzerland
Executive
Summary
This paper gives an overview of biodiversity and how it is
impacted by agricultural biotechnology, building upon chapters
on the impact of biotechnology on biodiversity for the European
Federation of Biotechnology (Braun & Bennett, 2001) and UNESCO
(Braun & Ammann, 2002). Biodiversity encompasses the fundamental
bases of life on earth, including genetic, species and ecosystem
diversity. There is a need to better understand biodiversity in
terms of its fundamental components (genes and taxa), the
interrelatedness of these components (ecology), their importance
for human life and life in general, and the factors that
threaten biodiversity. Within the tropics, Biodiversity is still
concentrated in unmanaged habitats. In temperate zones,
particularly in the European Union, almost 50% of the landscape
is agricultural, and agricultural lands contain a significant
portion of the biodiversity in these zones. The greatest threats
to biodiversity are destruction and deterioration of habitats,
particularly in tropical developing countries, and introductions
of exotic species. Maintaining biodiversity requires addressing
these threats.
Many of the factors affecting biodiversity are related directly
or indirectly to the needs of agricultural production, and it is
important to consider how these impacts could be mitigated.
Increasing human population and limited arable land have
demanded increased agricultural productivity leading to more
intensive agricultural practices on a global basis. In response,
higher yielding crop varieties have been coupled with increased
inputs in the form of fertilizers, irrigation, and pesticides
and more intensive practices such as greater tillage of soil and
fewer crop rotations and fallows. More recently, technological
advances have led to the development of genetically modified
(GM) crops with insect resistance and herbicide tolerance that
have a demonstrated potential to enhance productivity.
These technologies have been broadly adopted in some farming
systems, replacing broad-spectrum insecticides in some systems
and facilitating reductions in tillage in others.
Agricultural impacts on biodiversity can be divided into impacts
on in-field biodiversity and impacts on natural (off-site)
biodiversity. Intensive agriculture has negative impacts on both
species and genetic biodiversity within agricultural systems,
primarily because of low crop and structural diversity but also
through pesticide use and tillage. These impacts can be
addressed by encouraging diversification of agricultural
systems, and by reducing broad-spectrum insecticide use and
tillage, both of which GM crops can achieve in some systems.
Agricultural impacts on natural biodiversity primarily stem from
conversion of natural habitats into agricultural production and
from irrigation. Transport of fertilizers and pesticides into
aquatic systems also causes significant habitat deterioration
through eutrophication and toxicity. Increasing the efficiency
of agricultural production can reduce these impacts, as can
minimizing off-site movement of fertilizers and pesticides by
reducing tillage and total agricultural inputs.
Technologies such as GM crops are important in this respect.
Overall, creating agricultural systems with lower impact on
offside biodiversity and maintenance of high levels of inside
biodiversity will require us to utilize all available
technologies while simultaneously encouraging appropriate farmer
practices. This also means that agricultural and conservation
policy should work together in order to develop appropriate
markets.
The study was supported by the Monsanto Company It has been
reviewed by Francesca Tencalla and Graham Head from Monsanto St.
Louis and Brussels, Don Doering from the World Resources
Institute in Washington, Phil Dale from the John Innes Center in
Great Britain, Richard Braun from Biolink Bern, Switzerland, and
Detlef Bartsch from the Robert Koch Institute in Berlin.
The complete
document is available in PDF format at
http://www.botanischergarten.ch/Biotech-Biodiv/Report-Biodiv-Biotech12.pdf
|