"We are reporting on cotton, but the results are easily
transferable to food crops since the type of pest damage they
would sustain would be the same," said Matin Qaim, assistant
professor of agricultural and development economics at the
University of Bonn's Center for Development Research and the
study's lead author. "With populations in developing countries
growing exponentially, and available farmland stagnating,
there is an urgent need to find ways to increase crop yields
on the land that is available."
While transgenic crops have been shown to reduce the use of
certain chemical pesticides, they have not been known to
substantially increase crop yields in the countries where they
have been grown. For example, the yield gains of
insect-resistant cotton crops in the United States and China
average less than 10 percent. Bioengineered corn and soybeans
have even less impressive gains, and in some cases, the yield
effects are negative.
Why the difference in India? The answer seems to be that
the region suffers from a significantly higher pressure of
crop-destroying pests, and that there has not been a
widespread adoption of chemical pesticides in India to control
crop damage. Transgenic crops would likely have greater
potential to increase yields in such regions, said the
authors.
"The large scale applications of genetically modified crops
in the United States or China are not truly representative of
what would happen if the crops were grown in the small farm
sectors of poor countries in tropical and subtropical
climates," said Qaim, who conducted the research while he was
a post-doctoral fellow at UC Berkeley's Department of
Agricultural & Resource Economics, which is within the College
of Natural Resources. "The results we see in India are much
more representative of what would happen if transgenic crops
were used in sub-Saharan Africa or Southeast Asia."
The temperature and humidity of tropical regions produce
ripe conditions for insects that munch on crops. Absent the
regular use of pesticides, crops in those regions are
defenseless against pests.
Qaim said the reason China has not seen significant yield
gains in its transgenic crops is that the country has long had
a well-developed infrastructure to support pesticide use for
its farmers. Since pesticide sprays are widely used for
non-transgenic crops, the loss of yield is not as severe.
But for the majority of developing nations, the high cost
of pesticides makes them too risky an investment for small,
non-commercial farmers, the authors argued. In addition,
chemical pesticides are much more harmful to farmers' health
and the environment, and require a significant amount of
technical knowledge to be used properly, they said.
"Many of the rural poor in developing countries are
undereducated," said Qaim. "If they had effective pesticides,
they would still have to know that the proper time to spray
would be when the bollworms are in a certain larval stage, a
window of opportunity that lasts a mere two to three days."
"Understanding how to use pesticides properly is difficult,
but replacing the type of seed used is easy and thus more
desirable," Zilberman added. "The bottom line is,
biotechnology has the potential to positively impact the lives
of small, poor farmers in developing nations. It would be a
shame if anti-GMO (genetically modified organisms) fears kept
important technology away from those who stand to benefit the
most from it."