February 5, 2003
by
Alessandro
Pellegrineschi
Cell Biologist
International Maize and
Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)
Alessandro Pellegrineschi explores the scientific prospects for
developing crops that are resistant to drought, and says that
sceptics of GM technology must be won over to prevent future
tragedies.
The recent catastrophic crop failure in southern Africa due to
drought has brought on famine conditions of epic proportions. It
also raises the question: what could genetic modification (GM)
technology offer to poor farmers working marginal lands
vulnerable to drought, including many of those in sub-Saharan
Africa?
Several international agricultural research organisations have
already devoted considerable effort to improving drought
tolerance in the staple cereals that feed most of the world’s
poor. Plant breeders and farmers are well aware that some plants
cope with drought conditions much better than others; GM
technology makes it possible to transfer genes conferring this
drought tolerance to, and among, important food crops.
Yet the introduction of such crops, which have the potential to
significantly enhance food production in drought-stricken parts
of the world, has become the target of attacks by
environmentalist groups. The result may be to prevent whole
communities from gaining access to a technological development
that could — literally — make the difference between life and
death.
New technology on the horizon
One example of a promising new use of GM technology, which is
sadly facing an uncertain future, is a technique for increasing
drought tolerance being investigated at the International Maize
and Wheat Improvement Centre (CIMMYT)
in Mexico.
Wheat plants that have been genetically modified to withstand
drought are now being tested in biosafety greenhouses at CIMMYT.
Most of the plants produced have shown high tolerance to extreme
low-water conditions.
This research project illustrates how recent advances in both
molecular genetics and genetic engineering can be applied to
enhance drought tolerance in plants. Progress has been slow and
difficult, however, due to the complex effects of drought on
plants.
Complex plant pathways
For example, at least four independent signalling pathways act
in plants to switch on an array of genes in response to
dehydration. Some of these genes code for proteins that help
protect various parts of the plant cell during water loss while
others detoxify harmful substances. (1, 2)
Understanding how it would be best to utilise these genes is a
lengthy process.
CIMMYT researchers have initially focused on incorporating a
type of DREB gene (encoding a 'dehydration-responsive element
binding' protein), which enables the wheat plants to withstand
extreme water loss. Unfortunately, when this gene is continually
"switched on", plants are smaller and produce much lower yields
than unmodified varieties — significant disadvantages when it
comes to plant breeding.
But the scientists then found that by fusing the DREB gene with
the promoter region of another gene (rd29A), it is
switched on only under stress conditions of dehydration or cold
temperatures. The result is a plant that has a normal growth
pattern and yield in good conditions, but is also much more
resistant to drought, freezing, and high salinity. More work is
now needed to fully characterise the function of the additional
gene, and to dissect the complex process by which this gene is
expressed.
A promising future?
The researchers at CIMMYT are optimistic that their technique
offers a promising way to deal with the challenges of drought.
Other approaches have also been investigated, such as:
- developing plants that stall
seed development during periods of drought in order to
conserve water, or that are better at taking up water (known
as drought avoidance) (3);
- overexpression of a gene
related to drought tolerance (4);
- accumulation of sugars and
salts to protect against water loss (5, 6); and
- further investigation, at a
molecular level, of the physiological mechanisms by which
plants adapt to extreme environments (7).
Such research, when combined,
will lead to a much more complete understanding of drought
tolerance in plants. And with the help of genetic engineering it
will be possible to create plants with these traits, without the
need for long and tedious breeding programmes. But taking the
next critical step, namely moving these plants from the
laboratory to the fields of resource-poor farmers in developing
countries, will require a supportive public and the well-founded
assent and collaboration of developing nation governments.
A concerted effort is now required to convince both
decision-makers and environmentalist critics that the value of
crops produced in this way — and the capability to alleviate to
some extent the suffering faced by rural people in drought
conditions — strongly outweighs any perceived health and
environmental dangers. Failure to win over the sceptics could
result in tragedies that are ultimately as much the
responsibility of humans as of nature.
References:
- Singh K et al (2002)
Transcription factors in plant defense and stress responses.
Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 5(5):430-6
- Xiong L et al (2002) Cell
Signaling during Cold, Drought, and Salt Stress. Plant
Cell. 14:165-183
- Laporte MM et al (2002)
Engineering for drought avoidance: expression of maize
NADP-malic enzyme in tobacco results in altered stomatal
function. J. Exp. Bot. 53(369):699-705
- Qin X & Zeevaart JA (2002)
Overexpression of a 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase gene in
Nicotiana plumbaginifolia increases abscisic acid and phaseic
acid levels and enhances drought tolerance. Plant Physiol.
128(2):544-51
- Rontein D et al (2002)
Metabolic engineering of osmoprotectant accumulation in
plants. Metab. Eng. 4(1):49-56
- Garg AK et al (2002) Trehalose
accumulation in rice plants confers high tolerance levels to
different abiotic stresses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
99(25):15898-15903
- Bartels D & Salamini F (2001)
Desiccation tolerance in the resurrection plant
Craterostigma plantagineum. A contribution to the study of
drought tolerance at the molecular level. Plant Physiol.
127:1346-1353
reprinted from SciDev.net
|